all comments within are my opinions.
The question i am asking is this:
Are we hurting ourselves / RSI by continuing to give them FREE money / adding backing money ?
Make no mistake every time we add to the backing it is money they dont have to repay anyone.
It does add to the over all Valuation of CIG / RSI as a company since its used to build the studio and as marketing reference.
Considering the recorded sale of both Digital Anvil and Point of no Return are we pushing the RSI / CIG valuation to the point that we doom it to sale by CR & the other partners?
If we dont doom it to sale are we making the product / game delayed due to the steady influx of free cash to RSI ?
By constantly backing via the never ending ship sales do we prevent RSI from developing healthy business models for funding and expenditures ?
Do we allow unrealistic "perfection" goals for a game that inherently can never be perfect ?
Do we send the message that they dont have to live up to the hype that got this all started ?
We backed for Star Citizen, we let them add in another full game ( SQ42 ). Are we sending the message ... hey add in another AAA game to this Star Citizen budget we will wait even longer and fund all 3 !
Sooner or later you cut your child off and say good luck in the world ...... It is the BEST thing you can do FOR them.
I believe at almost 160 million we have given that child ( SC ) life and the ability to go forth and mature on its own now.
Please add in your thoughts but be respectful of all views.