Jump to content
VoA

Devchat -January 27th to 9th

Recommended Posts

Devchat -January 27th to 9th <<-- See link or below...

Feb 10

DEVCHAT -JANUARY 27TH TO FEBRUARY 9TH

DevChat2

BY DOLVAK

MONDAY, JANUARY 27TH

FUELING, DOCKING, AND STARFAIRING

Matt Sherman goes into a bit of detail of plans for fueling and docking mechanics.

CIG Matt Sherman (12:43:16 PM): Right now, the active-refueling is still WIP, so the how/where it connects is still getting some work done. Enough will be centered on the fuel-system mounted to the Starfarer though.

CIG Matt Sherman (12:50:03 PM): Well, again, the active-refuel is WIP. Realistically, it’s not a terribly hard thing to get added, since some of the function/tubing from the ship to fuel-tanks can be safely abstracted.

CIG Matt Sherman (12:50:41 PM): The refuel ports are planned, just not locked in for complete functionality, but they’re not going to be so substantial that it’d drastically alter any ship to accomodate.

CIG Matt Sherman (12:52:46 PM): The current repair/rearm/etc is just a rough setup to get it running so people can keep going around the Crusader map without having to always be respawning a new ship.

CIG Matt Sherman (12:58:27 PM): Right now, docking rings will be standardized among other docking rings, but not directly locked to turret sizing.

 

 

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8TH

CLOUDS AND NEBULAS

Ben talks a bit about tech demos in response to a question from a citizen.

Anonymous: Hey, Ben, I was wondering about something and I don’t know if you can talk about it at all – for the systems that will have gas clouds etc., are they planned to take up the whole system or are we gonna be able to fly in and out of the clouds freelancer-style?

CIG Ben Lesnick (5:26:25 PM): All the tech demos I’ve seen have been clouds you fly in and out of. I think science-wise, normally an entire system is inside a nebula… but maybe we’ll fudge it to make it look better.

CIG Ben Lesnick (5:29:09 PM): I love everything Wing COmmander, of course, but Wing Commander 3(and 4) were BAD at nebulas :)

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9TH

BMM DEETS

This is mostly fluff but my BMM addiction requires me to add any and all information about the BMM to DevChat.

 

CIG Kraiklyn (7:17:23 AM): I am salivating over my Banu Merchantman.

CIG Kraiklyn (7:18:19 AM): I have nothing to offer on BMM news. But it is certainly one of my favorite ships. :)

CIG Kraiklyn (7:32:05 AM): 1: You assumed I saw new details about the BMM :) 2: There are always plans for things, many things, different things. ..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Nord
      I'm curious, what is the average salary for a developer at CIG?
      Doing a quick google search the lowest is around $44k a year to $120k a year for a game developer. This is in the US. CIG has multiple studios around the world which also differentiate the average income. Let's say the average across all studios is $60k a year (a "wild" guess) and they now have around 500 employees. That's $30 million each year.
      Do we know how much CIG has used on salaries since 2012? I don't know the math here since I don't know all the numbers, but my wild guess would be around $80-90 million since 2012. If you add properties and other costs I'm thinking we are around $130 million in total. Giving them a $70 million + buffer, which is a 2 year salary guarantee for those 500 employees.  
       
      If this is even close, I feel comfort in knowing the funding is still going strong and they have at least 2 years to finish it up if money stops flowing. 
       
    • By VoA
      https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/9i1pia/con42_dev_panel_summary/ See Spoiler below .... NEWS Con42 - Dev Panel Summary
      r/starcitizen yonasismad 6h ago  
    • By VoA
      Reduced price for five game packages (free fly event) = Time to get your friends into SC for cheap 😃
        See https://robertsspaceindustries.com/pledge/game-packages
      GAME PACKAGES
          All Sort by: PriceName   AURORA MR STARTER PACK 3.2 FREEFLY- Package $35.00 USD$45.00 USDSAVE$10.00 USD IN STOCKMORE INFOADD TO CART MUSTANG ALPHA STAR CITIZEN + SQUADRON 42 COMBO - 3.2 FREEFLY- Package $55.00 USD$65.00 USDSAVE$10.00 USD IN STOCKMORE INFOADD TO CART AURORA MR STAR CITIZEN + SQUADRON 42 COMBO 3.2 FREEFLY- Package $55.00 USD$65.00 USDSAVE$10.00 USD IN STOCKMORE INFOADD TO CART

      MUSTANG ALPHA STARTER PACK 3.2 FREEFLY- Package $35.00 USD$45.00 USDSAVE$10.00 USD IN STOCKMORE INFOADD TO CART

      RELIANT KORE SC STARTER 3.2 FREEFLY- Package $75.00 USD$85.00 USDSAVE$10.00 USD IN STOCKMORE INFO
       
    • By VoA
      Star Citizen Development Process Interview Summary
      Inside the Star Citizen Development Process Full Article | https://wccftech.com/inside-the-star-citizen-development-process-exclusive-interview/
       
       
    • By Gremlich
      and some highlights:
      Refutation of CryTek's Claims
       
      Claim: CIG was only given permission to make "the game" with CryEngine, selling SQ42 standalone is in violation of this.
      Defense: The GLA defines "the game" as both "'Space Citizen' and its related space fighter game 'Squadron 42'", with a passage allowing for name changes (Space Citizen > Star Citizen).
      Additionally, this term does not apply to any games made without CryEngine, and CryEngine is no longer used.
       
      Claim: CIG violated the GLA by switching from CryEngine to Lumberyard, they are only allowed to "exclusively" use CryEngine.
      Defense: The GLA says they are given "exclusive rights to use CryEngine" and the right "to exclusively embed CryEngine in the game". The well-established meaning of this wording is that the right is given only to them (and those subcontracted within the terms), not that they are only allowed to use CryEngine.
       
      Claim: CIG is no longer displaying CryTek copyright notices in game, in violation of the GLA.
      Defense: This obligation only applies if CIG is using CryEngine, which they are not.
       
      Claim: Ortwin was employed by CryTek prior to becoming CIG's attorney and co-founder so he had a conflict of interest when negotiating the contract.
      Defense: Ortwin received a signed waiver from CryTek dismissing any conflict of interest.
       
      Claim: Confidential source code was shown on Bugsmashers and disclosed to FaceWare in violation of the GLA.
      Defense: No defense provided, though FaceWare was after the switch to Lumberyard.
       
      Claim: CIG was required to provide any bugfixes they developed for CryEngine up until launch.
      Defense: No defense provided.
       
      Additional Statements
      The GLA prohibits either party from seeking any damages from one another "except for intentional acts or omissions or gross negligent acts".
      CIG, not RSI, is the signatory of the GLA, so CryTek committed a legal blunder by pursuing RSI rather than CIG in a number of claims.
      CIG seeks to have the entire complaint dismissed with prejudice (barring any further related action) on the grounds that none of the complaints are sufficient.
×