Jump to content

MISC is Love | MISC Appreciation Thread

Recommended Posts

All things MISC are to be loved. The sleek, elegant designs are incorporated in every model making them some of the most iconic ships in the 'verse!

The Hull Series especially is a favourite of mine. Their design include both elegance and functionality, a rarity to come together with such flawlessness, but they are truly a remarkable feat. Hull E's will dwarf everything else in the 'verse with the exception of capital ships. Starfarers, even with Aegis intervention stand true to their reputation with undisputable value as fuel tankers as well their modularity proving essential to their role. Their bulky build shows off their strength, and even with the uneven shapes, curves and silhouette, you still know from first glance it is a creation of Musashi Industrial & Starflight Concern!

Whats your favourite ship?

Give your reasons for loving MISC, everybody has one, I know it!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now my favorite ship out of the ones that i have is the Freelancer DUR. I love the MISC look, especially the latest sneak peeks they gave us of the interior designs. I also own a Hull B, and I'm looking forward to truckin' around the verse.

MISC ships have a friendly industrial look that steps away from being grimy and dirty, like the RSI Orion or the AEGIS Reclaimer (which still is my favorite ship in the Verse, sorry:p )

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but MISC is the only ship manufacturer of the original 5 that doesn't have a flyable ship yet.

MISC's ship aesthetics has always been polarizing; some think they're beautiful, and others boring and ugly. What really matters is how they fly. Unfortunately, we haven't been able to determine that yet. Since MISC uses Xi-Tech thrusters, I imagine MISC ships could be nimble despite their bulk. Time will tell.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Reavern said:

I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but MISC is the only ship manufacturer of the original 5 that doesn't have a flyable ship yet.

Oh trust me, I've noticed. ive been wanting to see the Freelancers in the game for a while now.
It made sense they were pushed back though, MISC only makes commercial industrial ships, with the only real exception being the Freelancer MIS, and up until now the game is pretty much just "shoot things in space". All the other manufacturers make either military ships or jacks of all trades which can fill military roles.

Looking forward to the redesign though.. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, VoA said:

@GearBoxx you'll probably like this thread then --->>  MISC - Lore, Details and Design :wub:

What have you done?! I won't stop reading this, and its in my Star Citizen bookmark folder ;)

10 hours ago, Reavern said:

I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but MISC is the only ship manufacturer of the original 5 that doesn't have a flyable ship yet.

True, but you can expect to see the Starfarer next, then the Freelancer. Waiting for the redesigns is going to be great. I loved the look and concept art of the Freelancer, but when I actually bought one, and looked inside, admittedly I was dissapointed at its cramped feel. But no longer!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, GearBoxx said:

True, but you can expect to see the Starfarer next, then the Freelancer. Waiting for the redesigns is going to be great. I loved the look and concept art of the Freelancer, but when I actually bought one, and looked inside, admittedly I was dissapointed at its cramped feel. But no longer!

I'd be shocked if the Starfarer was flyable before the Freelancer. Are you thinking of the Reliant? Because I did hear that CIG is prioritizing the Reliant to get it flyable. If you have info that CIG is close to getting the Starfarer flying, I'd like to know your source.

I know that CIG is re-designing the Freelancer making it larger. I think that's a wise decision, because the Lancer always felt unnecessarily cramped. I assumed that it was deliberate, because CIG wanted to Lancer to evoke the feeling of being a long haul big rig trucker, having to spend upwards of 20 hours a day in their truck's cab or sleeper compartment. Now it seems like CIG has to make the Lancer larger to ensure the players and NPCs can move about the Lancer's interior without any clipping problems.

Also, now that the Reliant and Hull A and B haulers have been introduced, it's okay for the Lancer to be a little more spacious and comfortable. I think this will make Lancer owners very happy. :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Weehamster
      LAST EDIT: 20/Mar/2018
      Hi everyone /
      I mainly have ships/vehicles that are either from lore, concept, development or being re-worked, and I constantly add more to the albums.
      NOTE: I've started to keep/restore the albums for ships that are now flyable as I've had a few requests for them. 
      Aopoa (Xi'An) | "Capital" | Khartu-Al | Nox: Nox • (Skins) | "Oracle" | "Transport" | Volper |
      Aegis | Avenger (Re-work): Renegade • Stalker • Titan • Warlock | Eclipse | Gladius: Gladius • 'Valiant' | Hammerhead | Idris |Javelin | Reclaimer |
                 | Redeemer | Retaliator: Retaliator - (Modules) | Sabre: 'Comet' • Raven • Sabre | Vanguard: Harbinger • HopLite • Sentinel • Warden | Vulcan |
      Anvil | A4A 'Hurricane' | Carrack | Crucible | F7: F7A 'Hornet' Mk II • F7C 'Hornet' •  F7C 'Wildfire' • F7C-M 'Super Hornet' • F7C-R 'Tracker' • F7C-S 'Ghost' |
               | F8 'Lightning' | Pisces | T8 'Gladiator' | U4A-3 'Terrapin' | U9A-1 'Hawk' |
      Argo Astronautics | MPUV: 1C • 1P |
      BIRC (Banu) | Defender | Merchantman |
      Consolidated Outland | Mustang (Re-Work) | Pioneer |
      Crusader | Genesis: Starliner |
      Drake | Buccaneer | Caterpillar: Caterpillar • (Skins) | Cutlass: Black • Blue • Red | Dragonfly: Dragonfly • (Skins) | Herald |
      Esperia | "Blade" | "Glave" | "Prowler" |
      Kruger | P-52 Merlin | P-72 Archimedes |
      MISC | Endeavor | Freelancer (Variants): DUR • Freelancer • MAX • MIS | Hull: A • B • C • D • E | Prospector |
                | Razor | Reliant (Variants): Kore • Mako • Sen • Tana | Starfarer: Gemini • Starfarer |
      Origin | 300: 300i • 315p • 325a • 350r | 600i: Explorer • Touring | 85x | 890 Jump  | M50 | X1 (Variants): Force •  Velocity • X1 |
      RSI | Aurora: CL • ES • LN • LX • MR • (Skins) | Bengal | Constellation:  Andromeda • Aquila • Phoenix • Taurus | Lynx |
             | Orion | Pegasus | Polaris | Ursa | Zeus |
      RSI/Aegis | Retribution |
      Tumbril | Cyclone | Nova |
      Vanduul | "Cleaver" | "Driller" | "Harvester" | "Hunter" | "Kingship" | "Mauler" | "Scythe" | "Stinger" | "Void" |
      Ship Components | Coolers | Fuel Tanks & Intakes | Gun's | Missiles / Torpedoes |
                                     | Power-Plants | Quantum & Jump Drives | Radars | Shield Generators |
      -------------------------------------------- BONUS --------------------------------------------
      Characters | Banu | Human | Tevarin | Vanduul | Xi'An | Wildlife |
      First Person Components | Armor, Uniforms & Clothing | mobiGlas | Tools / Equipment | Weapons |
      Places  |  Environments | Hangars | Shubin | Star Systems Concepts | Terra | Truck-stop / Space Stations |
      Stanton | 1 (Hurston) | 1a (Ariel) | 1b (Aberdeen) | 1c (Magoa) | 1d (Ita) |
                    | 2 (Crusader) | 2a (Celin) | 2b (Daymar) | 2c (Yela) |
                    | AB (Arron Halo) | * (Delamar) |
                    | 3 (ArcCorp) | 3a (Lyria) | 3b (Wala) |
                    | 4 (Microtech) | 4a (Calliope) | 4b (Clio) | 4c (Euterpe) |        
      Other | Drones / Probes | Land Claiming | Logos | Posters/Ads | Racing | Sataball | Other Vanduul Art | UI |
    • By iG-88
      Let's post our ideas for Star Citizen. The galaxy's a huge place, full of curiosities and splendor! Please be polite and have fun, while we discuss in detail the additions we want to see in SC. Constructive criticism is always welcome, keep it friendly... 
      Here are a few ideas I will start us off with:
      Planets should have highly varied biomes and environments. These should include ocean planets, desert worlds, jungle moons, cavernous lands, ice planets, swamps, (and a personal favorite) lava worlds! It would be cool to have various atmospheric conditions, such as excessive heat or cold or toxicity, even radioactivity, which could have specified suits designed for protection from those environments (without which players would perish!). Planets should also definitely have varying levels of gravity, some with no gravity at all, and some with intense gravitational pull and pressure, suit required. Gas giants would be really cool, where traversing the upper atmosphere would be OK. There could be floating outposts, etc. Then moving too close to the core could crush most ships... Also would be cool to see asteroid-based outposts, with subterranean areas.
      Weather should factor in on at least some planets, but not all. Some planets should remain placid, while others could have weather cycles such as: sandstorms, blizzards, high winds, etc. It would also be interesting to have electrical/radiation storms where again, special shielding would be required to survive. Another interesting addition would be meteor showers, perhaps not damaging to the player in most cases... Of course, the most intense weather should be on planets with lesser city-populations. There should also be 'weather' cycles in space the likes of radiation/electrical storms, where ships' shields would be rendered ineffective. Perhaps here or there, a neutronic wave front (Star Trek, Ahem)! Deadly nebula!
      The ships so far are absolutely bad-ass. Can hardly put it into words just how right they look and feel. I do have one minor issue to discuss regarding player immersion: Planetary entry/re-entry seems a bit off... It feels somewhat awkward orienting the ship into a nose-dive and then accelerating toward the planet. While that should still be an option for entry, it seems lacking, if it's the only way. Players should be allowed to let their ships drift slowly downward towards the surface (with a horizontal orientation relative to ground), all the while getting pulled to greater and greater speeds due to gravity. Currently it seems as though there is no gravity, requiring ships to nose-dive and hit the thrusters. The level of gravity should also have effects on how quickly ships take off, and how much fuel is consumed. Also some of the more lightweight craft should be capable of water-landing and flotation, some, not all.
      Weapons are also looking pretty nice, and I can't wait to hunt some bounties and pirates with the Scourge Cannon! Turrets on ships are awesome and so are the weapons additions to the ships main systems. Weapons turrets on ships should not be automated. Automation would detract from the challenge of the game, and we never want that! Instead the player should be able to either hire NPCs or other players to man different positions aboard their ship. Also it seems some of the infantry firearms are being slightly 'overdone', so to speak. For example the Devastator shotgun seemingly has way too much level of detail and unnecessary bulk added to it. My suggestion is to lean more on the side of realism. I know it's Sci-Fi. Still I hope devs don't get hung up on making things like fancy-diamond-encrusted-platinum-laser cannons with under-barrel flame throwers..! It would be amazing to see (in rare cases), Orbital Weapons Platforms that could, if accessed, rain supreme firepower down on the planet's surface, destroying small outposts, structures or towns... Of course it would be necessary to make accessing it an extreme challenge.
      Accessories are nice. But keep away from over-extravagant weapon design.
      Exploration should be the fundamental, key point of the game. While some may argue that it is space battles, I tend to disagree. With so many space craft, vehicles and weapons, the gameplay will quickly become boring and the equipment redundant if there is not a vast amount of exploration. Here are a few thoughts on aspects of exploration: Artifacts, Flora and Fauna. Scattered throughout the verse there could be a plethora of different types of Artifacts to be found, only through rigorous exploring. There should be ancient ruins with old alien technology, perhaps rare weapons. There should be Obelisks and Pyramids and rare trinkets that could be sold or held as trophies. There could be mysterious devices, like the Orbs in Mass Effect (the first game) with strange properties. There could be alien tech that could be found and then saved for use at a far later date. Regarding Flora and Fauna, there could be a huge variety of harvesting options for certain crafting items. There really ought to be many creatures, perhaps mostly neutral/friendly. However some animals, in rare cases could turn out to be hostile, and highly challenging to face. Perhaps giant worms, or insectoids! Another thing could be infected worlds, or derelict ships (think Dead Space, or The Thing) where your only choice is to fight for survival or run for your life. There should also be intact derelicts. We've seen plenty of demolished ones. Some should be intact, abandoned in space, or even on land. Exploration should not, and I can't stress this enough, should not stem solely or mostly from missions! Let the missions be vast and varying in type by all means, a multitude of missions is always welcome. But please don't conflate missions and side quests, with exploration. 
      -Armor & Apparel-
      The armor should of course have good variety. Weight should factor in, which I believe it currently does. Also there should definitely be highly specialized suits for specific tasks. Of course there'll be a space suit for EVA in outer space, but adding other specializations for other armor sets/suits would be great too. There should be a set more suited for enduring intense heat, or cold or radiation. There should also mostly be non-EVA capable sets IMO. Body armor should not be conflated with EVA suits, and they should for the most part be separate, with a few exceptions. It would be cool to see a lot of options other than  simple armor for combat and space suits for EVA. One thought would be a stealth-suit with either quiet movement or even invisibility. Mostly I'm hoping it will prove an actual challenge to obtain armors, so that everyone isn't immediately buffed just after they begin playing. Let there be lots of varying, quirky outfits to be found.
      NPCs for hire or available as crew members should use a rating system the likes of the one used in Metal Gear Solid V. They could have a certain class of career like 'linguist' or 'gunner' or 'medic', and within that specialty a certain set of ratings. Players should be able to activate distress beacons (false or genuine). If a player's ship is captured, they should be given the option to fight aboard the enemy ship in order to escape (think Han Solo and co, the capture of Millennium Falcon!).
      Where are all the AIs? This is the future after all... There should be robots of some kind or another, even perhaps a sentient machine race!
      There should also be a minimal amount of spawn/respawn actions. I realize this is counter-intuitive, given there's a massive universe to traverse. But it will add to the replay and return-to-game value; if people can easily spawn their ships and/or fast travel around it will make things overly-easy. It's nice that there's a wait-timer for summoning ships (at least destroyed ones). However, if a ship is not at the station at which you are staying, it should take time to arrive near you, and there should be a fuel cost and fee. Having all your ships easily at your fingertips will take away from the immersion and challenge of the game. It should also be more challenging IMO, to acquire cash. Gaining millions of credits should take a very long time. The quicker people progress in the game, the quicker the MMO will die.
      I don't believe there should be a 'difficulty setting' option. The universe in general should prove pretty damn challenging, with areas of extreme and lesser challenges. Some mini-games would also be cool, so long as they remain within the Persistent Universe. Game modes are a bad idea. It's understandable at this point, given there are players currently in the game who want something working. But later on, when development is (mostly) "complete", having different game-modes will detract from the main MMO.
      All hoverbikes should remain as hoverbikes, and not be turned into flying-space-hoverbikes! Please remove the flight-function for hoverbikes. Having flight for them is ridiculous and totally misses the point of a hoverbike. While I do agree that they should have some (slight) altitude control and perhaps a jump/boost, they should not  be able to simply fly away, especially up into space. A hoverbike is like a speeder from Star Wars, it's not for flight; only for elevated, fast, ground travel! This goes for all ships and vehicles; if they have a specialty let them stick to that specialty, no blurring lines, except perhaps in rare cases.

    • By FreddySEMIASAS
      Hello, I'm selling my Endeavor Base (cause, life project with my wife), ccu'd from a Nox LTI, Paypal, in EURO please, for 260€ (315$)

      Discord live, possible. You can contact me on Discord @ "[APF] Freddy#0551" or on steam, via Reddit or MP here.

      Screen #1 : https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/337327771795849218/416284781131726872/Capture.PNG

      CCu applied : https://i.imgur.com/6e7HqmO.png

      ---- I have one trade successful : https://www.reddit.com/r/Starcitize...etaliator_lti_or_2yr/?st=jdyvyiuf&sh=26662ada

      Original thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Starcitize...ti_ccud_from_nox_lti/?st=je3fu7tz&sh=3b602c3c
    • By SnowStorm
      ACCOUNT  FOR SALE: See First Reply, decided it was a safer route 
      Two purchases here on the forums in the past. A Terrapin CCU from @AstroJak (on June 19, 2017) 
      and a Dragonfly LTI from @StarC_Newbie (on May 31st, 2017) I can pull up the messages upon request. 
      List of ships and items owned (Nothing is gift-able, all purchased over time with store credits)
      Package - Anniversary 2017 Mustang Discount Starter package
      Standalone Ship- Anvil Hawk LTI CCu'd to Freelancer LTI
      Standalone Ship- Anvil Hawk LTI CCu'd to Cutlass Black LTI
      Standalone Ship- Anvil Hawk LTI CCu'd to Terrapin LTI
      Package - Squadron 42 Add-on ($15.00 value)
      Kastak Arms Custodian SMG - Citizencon 2947 ($5.00 value) 
      Masters of Design Series - Hoplite & MPUV
      Masters of Design Series - Polaris & Razor
      Masters of Design Series - Caterpillar & Dragonfly
      Masters of Design Series - Prospector & Herald
      Masters of Design Series - Hurricane & Terrapin
      Holographic models- ICC Port Olisar
      Holographic models- IMS Bolliver
      Holographic models- Icarus One
      Holographic models- ICC Probe
      Hitbox Magazine
      Big Benny's Vending Machine
      Christmas Reward 2016
      Opera Mushroom
      Citizencon 2946 Trophy Subscriber Edition
      Conner's Beard Moss
      Takuetsu Mini Reliant Kore Model
      Takuetsu Golden Herald Model
      Takuetsu Mustang Gamma Model
      Buy Back tokens = 1
      Buy Back ships and items listed below
      Cutlass Black package
      Cutlass Starter Pack Gamescom2017
      Standalone - Drake Dragonfly Black
      Standalone - AOPOA Nox Kue LTI Warbond
      Ship Upgrades - Gladius to Cutlass Black Upgrade CCU
      Ship Upgrades - Gladius to Cutlass Black Upgrade CCU
      Ship Upgrades - Gladius to Cutlass Black Upgrade CCU
      Ship Upgrades - Gladius to Cutlass Black Upgrade CCU
      Ship Upgrades - Gladius to Cutlass Black Upgrade CCU
      Ship Upgrades - Freelancer to F7C Hornet Upgrade CCU
      Standalone Ship - Tumbril Cyclone LTI Presale
      Standalone Ship - X1 Force Edition LTI
      Standalone Ship - RSI Aurora LX Gamescom2017
      Standalone Ship - AEGIS Gladius
      Package - Freelancer
      Ship Upgrades - Freelancer to Freelancer Max Upgrade
      Package - Explorer Pack Gamescom2017
      Package - Mustang Alpha SC Starter
      Add-Ons - Air and Space Pack LTI (Terrapin and Cyclone AA)
      Package - Mustang Alpha SC Starter
      Package - Aurora MR SC Starter
      Package - Freelancer
      Ship Upgrades - Freelancer to Freelancer DUR Upgrade
      Standalone Ship - Drake Herald - Drake Sale
      $5,000 UEC starter money
      $197,500 REC virtual store money
      One paid Handle name change ready to use ($5.00 value)
      Total Melt value of account = $419.50
      Total ever spent on account = $494.50
      PM for more information, only selling because of a new addition to the family  and my wife said so  

    • By Delenin
      I've just gotta know if this is a common "issue."
      I saw that exchanging my F7C-S Hornet GHOST for a Freelance DUR was $0 because they cost the same base price (I didn't know you could even exchange ships of equal value.) I went ahead with it knowing I could just switch it back if I didn't like it. Instead of giving me a Freelancer DUR, what the upgrade did instead was not only keep the GHOST, but also threw in an extra Hornet and a standard-class Freelancer.

      I mean I'm not upset- At the end of the day I've got three ships now, but none of them are actually what I meant to get. They all show up in my hanger, each can be summoned and customized in the universe, and I can even request insurance for them.
      I could always try to upgrade my ship to the GHOST then back again but I'm a bit worried about that, I don't want to break it anymore than it already is. Might as well let sleeping dogs lie, I know that after awhile everything will probably be back to normal.
      Has this happened to anyone else? Maybe not exactly the same, but something along these lines?