Letter from the Chairman

[GeraldEvans]

Hi everyone,

On the set of Squadron 42

Now that I am back in Los Angeles I thought I would write a letter to all of you who have backed Star Citizen. I haven’t had the chance to communicate to everyone as frequently as I normally have due to my directing duties on the Squadron 42 performance capture shoot. Directing a shoot is a pretty intensive affair which absorbed most of my time. The rest of the hours I wasn’t sleeping were taken up with the business of directing a game as large as Star Citizen with video conferences and emails or online collaboration with the six development studios spread across two continents and six time zones. To help address some of the questions that came up during the shoot, I’ve put together a special 10 for the Chairman companion piece to this letter, which you can find here.

A week ago Wednesday we wrapped the main performance and motion capture for Squadron 42, Episode 1, after 66 shooting days. We started shooting on March 31st at Ealing Studios in London and completed principal performance and motion capture on July 8th. This is more shooting days than any film I’ve ever been involved with! I directed my last scene on Friday July 3rd, leaving David Haddock, our lead writer, who along with William Weissbaum wrote the Squadron 42 script, to direct the last three days of secondary character “wild lines” and motion sets the following Monday through Wednesday.

A Grand Tour

That Monday I took a train up to Wilmslow to the Foundry 42 UK Office to spend some time with the Squadron 42 development team in person as well as gather key people from our various studios and our technical partners for a technical summit on our character and facial animation technology and pipeline. Like everything on Star Citizen and Squadron 42 we are aiming to push the envelope – with the tech we are working on for animation, shaders and AI we are aiming to give you a fluid immersion inside the story of Squadron 42 and later the bigger world of the Persistent Universe of Star Citizen, in a way that conveys the emotional subtlety of film. It’s one of the reasons why our performance capture shoot was so long – maybe 10% of the scenes we shot were for cinematics, the rest were all for scenes where we allow full player control that play out during game control from your POV. Most games just record voiceovers for these types of scenes over a few days, but for us it was important to capture the full performance of our amazing cast. This allows us to then blend the captured performance of the actor’s face and body with other motions to adjust the game character’s looks and movement so they react in a natural manner to the player’s actions (whatever they may be). At the fidelity we are going for we are definitely breaking new ground, but luckily we are working with some of the leading companies and people in the area of scanning real people and bringing their performances into 3D in the most life-like way. 3 Lateral and Cubic Motion are well known for their amazing work in this field and we are partnering with them to push performance capture and real time playback beyond what you have seen in a game before. Internally we have been hiring up some incredible talent, including the architect of the CryEngine animation system, who recently joined us in Frankfurt.

 

Some photos from my adventure in London

Wednesday night I flew with my brother Erin to Frankfurt Germany to visit the German Foundry 42 development studio, where the 22 newest members of the Star Citizen family have just moved into their new home, after being crammed into temporary offices for the last few months. The energy and enthusiasm there was fantastic to experience first-hand. We have been lucky enough to have some of the best technologists and game developers in the business join us these past few months, the very people who were involved in building the engine we are using. These are guys who did things with a PC in 2003 and 2006 that no one thought possible. Star Citizen is lucky to have them and we spent Thursday and Friday going over our engine and technology road map, as well as reviewing some of the work they have been doing these last months. As we have mentioned before, Star Citizen (and even Squadron 42) presents a challenge in terms of detail and scale that no game has tackled successfully to date. To do what the game requires there needs to be a different approach to how things are organized, rendered and updated. This is why we spent eight months converting the engine to 64 bit precision and why we have developed some new technologies like the Zone system and local grids, which fundamentally change how the engine organizes, streams, updates and renders objects in the world (or more accurately: the ‘verse). We can now manage one massive play area with all sorts of objects; single seat fighters, multi crew ships, capital ships with hundreds of rooms and thousands of objects inside, huge space stations or incredibly detailed landing environments. We will be showing you the first preview of this in action at Gamescom. We still have lots of work to do, not the least being the network side of things, to be able to update all this with a decent amount of players participating. Even in the early stages it is credibly exhilarating.

 

Squadron 42 concept art, the "Chop Shop"

Squadron 42 is going to be something special. I could feel it on set with the performances we were getting, with me knowing how we can bring those into the game. Squadron 42 is going to be like this amazing sci-fi movie where instead of just watching, you truly feel you’re in the world, emotionally connected to the other characters in the story. The action goes fluidly from space, to ship board, to on-foot gun battles aboard ships, stations and asteroid bases – all from the same 1st person point of view, all fluidly blending with no loading screens.

 

I look at the work Tony is spearheading on the Persistent Universe side: some of the environments we are constructing, the rendering and graphics technology we have in the pipeline to render these worlds in a fluid manner to go from space flight to being on-foot at your destination. Also the attention Tony is spending on making sure there are many different careers and roles you can play in the bigger universe. I know the dream game that I have always wanted to make and that you all want to play and backed for is closer than ever.

I have never been more excited by what we are building then I am now.

That’s not to say I did not come home to a little drama

Star Marine & Production

It seems some gaming outlets got a little confused with my last FPS letter, which was no different to the one that we did back in May to let people know where we were on Star Marine / the FPS module. As you all know we are shy of announcing firm dates for module releases until they are in the Public Test Universe (PTU) as it’s hard to predict exact dates in open development, especially in the stages that still involve R&D, unless you build in large time buffers. We have been burned by this multiple times before so I have heeded all your wishes to not give out dates until we are sure. Perhaps we stressed the point a little too strongly as suddenly gaming websites were running with the headline, “Star Citizen FPS delayed indefinitely!” which was unfortunate as this phrase is usually a euphemism for a project being put on indefinite hold or canceled.

Don’t worry, it’s not! We’re hard at work on the FPS – as you can see from our update on Friday – and you will have it in your hands sooner rather than later.

Shortly after the FPS flap, the news that the LA Studio’s Executive Producer, Alex Mayberry, had left for personal reasons after a year on the job combined with a couple of other staff departures that we had previously announced had some people worrying about whether they should be concerned.

With a company the size of CIG and its subsidiaries there is always going to be turnover. We are a very large company now, dedicated entirely to making Star Citizen and Squadron 42. We have four development studios: Los Angeles, Austin, Wilmslow, UK and Frankfurt, Germany. Our internal headcount has gone from five at the end of 2012 to 59 at the end of 2013 to 183 at the end of 2014 and to 255 now. That’s some pretty huge growth. The turnover at CIG is no more or less than it was at Origin, EA, Digital Anvil or Microsoft when I was making games there. The difference is that since we conduct our development in an open manner people get the opportunity to know some of the individuals working on the game, in a way you wouldn’t with a normal publisher, so a departure becomes more noticeable. Sometimes an employee may get an opportunity to go elsewhere in a role they feel will be more rewarding personally. Sometimes our breakneck pace of development is too much, or sometimes people just want to make a change for personal reasons.

The Foundry 42 DE team!

We made a conscious decision early on to go where the developers were as opposed to making them come to one place. If I hadn’t done this we would only have an office in LA as that’s where I live, but I decided in today’s world with fast Internet (we run 1 Gigabit connections at all our offices), Cloud and online sharing technology we don’t have to force talented people to leave their homes to work on Star Citizen. This approach has allowed us to staff up with some of the best people in the business. The UK and German office are key examples of this. This approach of distributed development is not new or unusual but it does require you to work hard to keep all locations working together as harmoniously as possible.

As such, we are constantly reassessing our development structure and methodology to improve our efficiency. With Alex’s departure we took the opportunity to streamline all production leadership under Erin. Erin has an amazing track record, delivering more than $500M worth of Lego games during his seven years of running Traveler’s Tales Fusion, not to mention the titles he has built with me at Origin, EA and Digital Anvil. I had asked Erin to take on this role originally when he joined but at the time he wanted to concentrate on building up Foundry 42. Now with Foundry 42 as our largest studio (between Wilmslow and Frankfurt there are 138 people) and those teams operating efficiently, Erin felt comfortable taking on a wider role. I could not be happier as he has been with me since the first Wing Commander and the best producer / production executive I know.

Meanwhile, the PU team in Austin is working on the next planet in the ArcCorp system

Open Development

If you have followed Star Citizen from our kickoff in October, 2012, you know that the game we’re building today is a bigger and more technically accomplished project than I thought was possible back then. The original crowd funding goal was to raise enough money to deliver regular community updates, access to the multiplayer dogfighting alpha and a single player campaign called Squadron 42. You can see the first goal, which was achieved on 25th of October 2012 here. It’s no secret that I originally thought I would have to build a smaller game first and then over time add features and content to get close to the full living universe that I have always wanted to realize. This community came together and, both through your financial support and your belief in the project, made something incredible possible. You went above and beyond in backing our dream and so we are going to, also. Because of you, we’re building cities where I had hoped for just landing pads, we’re building armadas of starships where I asked for squadrons and we’re populating a living, breathing world in ways I didn’t dare to dream of in 2012.

You all know that already; you’ve lived that. You’ve seen Star Citizen evolve and start to come together. You’ve watched our atoms form molecules, our modules form a real, playable game (that you can boot up and play today!). There are people out there who are going to tell you that this is all a BAD THING. That it’s ‘feature creep’ and we should make a smaller, less impressive game for the sake of having it out more quickly or in order to meet artificial deadlines. Now I’ll answer those claims in one word: Bullshit!

Star Citizen matters BECAUSE it is big, because it is a bold dream. It is something everyone else is scared to try. You didn’t back Star Citizen because you want what you’ve seen before. You’re here and reading this because we are willing to go big, to do the things that terrify publishers. You’ve trusted us with your money so we can build a game, not line our pockets. And we sure as hell didn’t run this campaign so we could put that money in the bank, guarantee ourselves a profit and turn out some flimsy replica of a game I’ve made before. You went all in supporting us and we’ve gone all in making the game. Is Star Citizen today a bigger goal than I imagined in 2012? Absolutely. Is that a bad thing? Absolutely not: it’s the whole damn point.

Will it take longer to deliver all this? Of course! When the scope changes, the amount of time it will take to deliver all the features naturally increases. This is something we are acutely aware of. How do we balance the mutually conflicting wants of the community; to have this hugely ambitious game, but not wait forever for it?

Our answer is to embrace open development and share features and functionality that will go into the final game before everything is completed. Originally we had just planned to share a multiplayer dogfighting alpha and then the beta of the game (which would have just been Squadron 42). As we smashed every stretch goal, and continued to power through additional ones, it was pretty apparent we had to find a way to keep people engaged while we were building this virtual universe. In today’s 24/7 short attention-span world people don’t have the patience to wait around for years. This is why we decided on multiple modules: the Hangar, so you could first see your ships and walk around them in the manner you would in the final game, then Arena Commander, to allow people to get a taste and give feedback on the basic dogfight and flight mechanics. Star Marine, which will be available shortly, is the module for backers to experience and give their feedback on the First Person Shooting component of the game. Not long after that we will be releasing the next level of Arena Commander, allowing players with bigger ships to fly them with friends, on maps that are closer in size to the huge ones you’ll have in the final game. Then we’re rolling out aspects of the Persistent Universe: first there will be just planet side environments to explore, but not long after you’ll be able to transition to space and fly to another destination, and then after that to another system. We have taken this route to allow people to experience and give feedback to make the game better as we build it. Almost no one else does this. And we’re still doing it: case in point, our first 16-player version of Arena Commander went to the PTU on Saturday! I’ve said it countless times: my goal is to make the journey of Star Citizen’s development worth the price of admission and the final game be the best bonus in the world.

So while it will take longer to build the full vision that all of you are helping to achieve by contributing your funds, our plan is to have you play large sections of it without having to wait for everything to be done like you would on a normal retail product. That is the advantage of being online and on the PC. It should be a win / win: you get to play a more limited version early, a version that is closer to the original goals, but you know the bigger, fuller featured version is coming – and the best bit is that you get it all for your initial pledge!

Is ‘feature creep’ a worry? Sure… it’s always a worry, and we are well aware of it. However, building the game to the stretch goals embraced and endorsed by the community is not feature creep! We made the decision to stop stretch goals at the end of last year. That was a hard choice to abandon one of the central tenets of crowd funding projects, the idea that the sky is the limit… but it’s one we felt we had to make for the better of the game. Today, we have a radical design that’s like nothing else in the industry and we’re building towards it every hour of every day. We count on the community’s continued support to build the game to the high level that we set out to accomplish. Allowing independent authors to do more is the point of crowd funding, and going beyond our limitations is the entire point of Star Citizen.

Occasionally I see comments out there from people who haven’t taken the time to watch the thousands of YouTube videos of people running around their ships and hangars or dogfighting in space, or visit our site to read the vast amount of information we make publicly available that call us vaporware or a glorified tech demo. Arena Commander, which is still evolving, is a better looking and playing game than a lot of finished games out there. We are maintaining a live game and building one all at the same time. It’s harder than just developing, as most companies that run online games will tell you, but it’s worth it, both to ensure you get to experience features as soon as they are ready and to make a better game in the long run.

This is all being made possible by your enthusiasm and support. As we promised since the start of the campaign, we invest every dollar raised into the game. Anyone with knowledge about game development can assess our spending based on the information we share every month. It speaks for itself that from the outset our TOS provides for an accounting to be published if we ever had to stop development before delivering. With the progress and the funds we’ve raised this is no longer an issue, but quite obviously we wouldn’t have provided for this clause, if we weren’t using your funds very carefully for the development of Star Citizen.

The rest of the team and I are immensely grateful for all your support and passion. We’re hard at work on finishing up the next Arena Commander patch, Star Marine, the Persistent Universe, Squadron 42, as well as working on something special to show you all at Gamescom!

We genuinely want people to be happy with their decision to back Star Citizen, because I and everyone else on the team passionately believe in Star Citizen. This is the dream game that all of us have wanted to build all our lives. And while I can’t promise you everything will always go smoothly or features or content won’t arrive later than we want them to, I can promise that we will never stop until we have achieved this dream.

To paraphrase a key speech from the beginning of Squadron 42;

“Several years from now, when you are surrounded by your loved ones, and they ask you what did you do during the battle for Space Sims and PC games, you can look them in the eye and say; I helped make Star Citizen.”

Edited July 20, 2015 by GeraldEvans
Formatting

[Cruxvader]

I joined this game because of the thought of how awesome Privateer online would be... Suffice to say, I am greatly impressed with Roberts and the team. Go star citizen and glory to the verse!

[XplatformJEDI]

Glory to the verse!!!!

This is going to be awesome.

[Zhane]

There are people out there who are going to tell you that this is all a BAD THING. That it’s ‘feature creep’ and we should make a smaller, less impressive game for the sake of having it out more quickly or in order to meet artificial deadlines. Now I’ll answer those claims in one word: Bullshit!
Star Citizen matters BECAUSE it is big, because it is a bold dream. It is something everyone else is scared to try. You didn’t back Star Citizen because you want what you’ve seen before. You’re here and reading this because we are willing to go big, to do the things that terrify publishers. You’ve trusted us with your money so we can build a game, not line our pockets. And we sure as hell didn’t run this campaign so we could put that money in the bank, guarantee ourselves a profit and turn out some flimsy replica of a game I’ve made before. You went all in supporting us and we’ve gone all in making the game. Is Star Citizen today a bigger goal than I imagined in 2012? Absolutely. Is that a bad thing? Absolutely not: it’s the whole damn point.

 Oh my God.

*slow clap* *wipes tear* *reaches for wallet* 

[Drago]

[Xuu]

I am more motivated than ever to pledge money now!

Damn Chris Roberts is like a prophet! 

[GeraldEvans]

He's just a talented man with a dream. Let's not confuse him with L. Ron. Hubbard. There are enough people out there who think backers are a cult of personality slavishly devoted to Chris Roberts.

[VoA]

Star Citizen, feature creep and money: "Now I'll answer those claims in one word: Bulls**t!" • Eurogamer's news article on Chairman's Letter 

Star Citizen, feature creep and money

"Now I'll answer those claims in one word: Bulls**t!"

• Share this:
•  Facebook109
•  Twitter24
•  Google+
•  Reddit57

By Wesley Yin-Poole Published 21/07/2015

PC space game Star Citizen has been in development for a while now. Some people are worried it's been in development too long. As the scope of the project grows and features are delayed, detractors accuse developer Chris Roberts and his company Cloud Imperium Games of succumbing to the dreaded "feature creep".

It's a sentiment that has grown in recent weeks following the delay of the first-person shooter portion of Star Citizen and news of a few departures of key members of the development team. And let's not forget the huge amount of money CIG has at its disposal to fuel development of Star Citizen: at the time of publication an incredible $85m of funding had been raised from just over 900,000 backers.

Couple this with the nature of Star Citizen's funding - much of its money comes from the sale of virtual ships despite the game still being in development - and the result is louder, and more vociferous, questions of Roberts' operation.

Now, Roberts has addressed this concern head on in a blog post published on the Roberts Space Industries website. In it, the developer rejects calls for CIG to scale back the scope of Star Citizen, insisting building as ambitious a game as possible is still the right course of action.

"There are people out there who are going to tell you that this is all a BAD THING," he said.

"That it's 'feature creep' and we should make a smaller, less impressive game for the sake of having it out more quickly or in order to meet artificial deadlines. Now I'll answer those claims in one word: Bulls**t!

"Star Citizen matters BECAUSE it is big, because it is a bold dream. It is something everyone else is scared to try. You didn't back Star Citizen because you want what you've seen before. You're here and reading this because we are willing to go big, to do the things that terrify publishers. You've trusted us with your money so we can build a game, not line our pockets.

"And we sure as hell didn't run this campaign so we could put that money in the bank, guarantee ourselves a profit and turn out some flimsy replica of a game I've made before. You went all in supporting us and we've gone all in making the game."

Star Citizen's production revolves around the creation and release of modules. The Hangar module, which lets you view your space ships in a futuristic garage of sorts, is live. Arena Commander, the spaceship dogfighting portion of the game, is also live.

Currently in development is Planetside (Star Citizen's social space), Squadron 42 (the game's story campaign), the aforementioned first-person shooter portion, now called Star Marine, and, bringing the game's parts together, the Persistent Universe module.

All these features are being built across four studios: Los Angeles, Austin, Wilmslow, UK and Frankfurt, Germany. CIG, like Star Citizen, is much bigger now than it was even just a few years ago, with over 250 people working on the game.

"Is Star Citizen today a bigger goal than I imagined in 2012? Absolutely. Is that a bad thing? Absolutely not: it's the whole damn point," Roberts continued.

"Will it take longer to deliver all this? Of course! When the scope changes, the amount of time it will take to deliver all the features naturally increases. This is something we are acutely aware of. How do we balance the mutually conflicting wants of the community; to have this hugely ambitious game, but not wait forever for it?

"Our answer is to embrace open development and share features and functionality that will go into the final game before everything is completed."

Roberts said his original plan was to share a multiplayer dogfighting alpha and then the beta of the game, which would have been just Squadron 42. But as every stretch goal was smashed and new stretch goals were met, "we had to find a way to keep people engaged while we were building this virtual universe".

"In today's 24/7 short attention-span world people don't have the patience to wait around for years," Roberts explained.

"This is why we decided on multiple modules: the Hangar, so you could first see your ships and walk around them in the manner you would in the final game, then Arena Commander, to allow people to get a taste and give feedback on the basic dogfight and flight mechanics."

Directly addressing concern over Star Marine's status, Roberts said it will be available "shortly". Not long after that's out, CIG will release the next level of Arena Commander, which will allow those with bigger ships to fly them with friends on maps that are closer in size to those expected to feature in the final game.

CIG will then launch aspects of the Persistent Universe. First, there will be plantside environments to explore, then you'll be able to transition to space and fly to another destination, and then after that to another system.

"I've said it countless times: my goal is to make the journey of Star Citizen's development worth the price of admission and the final game be the best bonus in the world," Roberts said.

The idea, Roberts said, is people will be able to play sections of Star Citizen without having to wait for everything to be done.

"It should be a win / win: you get to play a more limited version early, a version that is closer to the original goals, but you know the bigger, fuller featured version is coming - and the best bit is that you get it all for your initial pledge."

Accusations of feature creep, though, is a thorn Roberts has struggled to pluck from his side. He's faced growing concern from some backers who believe Star Citizen is perhaps growing too big - and too ambitious - for its own good.

"Is 'feature creep' a worry? Sure... it's always a worry, and we are well aware of it," Roberts countered.

"However, building the game to the stretch goals embraced and endorsed by the community is not feature creep! We made the decision to stop stretch goals at the end of last year. That was a hard choice to abandon one of the central tenets of crowdfunding projects, the idea that the sky is the limit... but it's one we felt we had to make for the better of the game.

"Today, we have a radical design that's like nothing else in the industry and we're building towards it every hour of every day. We count on the community's continued support to build the game to the high level that we set out to accomplish. Allowing independent authors to do more is the point of crowdfunding, and going beyond our limitations is the entire point of Star Citizen."

The more sceptical observers have gone as far as to label Star Citizen vaporware or a glorified tech demo. They wonder whether the game will ever launch, and suggest Roberts and co will be happy to continue to rake in cash from sales of virtual space ships that will never be playable.

"Arena Commander, which is still evolving, is a better looking and playing game than a lot of finished games out there," Roberts said.

"We are maintaining a live game and building one all at the same time. It's harder than just developing, as most companies that run online games will tell you, but it's worth it, both to ensure you get to experience features as soon as they are ready and to make a better game in the long run."

Roberts goes on to insist that CIG invests every dollar raised into the game, and points to its Terms of Service, which states an accounting would be published if the company ever had to stop development before delivering.

"With the progress and the funds we've raised this is no longer an issue, but quite obviously we wouldn't have provided for this clause, if we weren't using your funds very carefully for the development of Star Citizen," Roberts said.

All eyes now turn to Gamescom in August, where, Roberts said, CIG will show off "something special". The pressure's on.

•  

Edited July 21, 2015 by VoA

[WarWulf]

All these features are being built across four studios: Los Angeles, Austin, Wilmslow, UK and Frankfurt, Germany. CIG, like Star Citizen, is much bigger now than it was even just a few years ago, with over 250 people working on the game.

•  

Amazed that this was written by an englishman. I had to check google twice.

 

[Zhane]

Everyone knows you lot don't know how to write. Adding u's to everything, sticking commas everywhere, getting the date backwards...

[Gremlich]

Bravo Zulu

 

Derek Smart's head is going to explode.

Edited July 21, 2015 by Gremlich

[Comet]

Wow.

He faced the issue head on.

He could have evaded the issue. Or used more politically and legally correct expressions.
He basically accepts his position.
This is a statement of commitment : "I'm putting my credibility on the line. We're doing this even if others think we can't."

This takes courage. I hope they can deliver a great game, but even I can't state for sure they will. 
So many things can go wrong. 

What Chris did here is really something. If things go wrong you can be sure that people will use this post against him. And he knows it.

This is the gaming equivalent of the "we choose to go to the moon" speech by JFK.

 

[Buckaroo]

We know Chris's track record.

We know he can build something amazing

I, for one (and probably many, many more here and out there) have never lost faith that Chris and the whole CIG team will make Star Citizen something we've all always wanted and probably even more!  Chris' letter and also 10 for the Chairman only solidifies that faith--and I'm talking a "cult" faith.  It's a trust that CIG will deliver, in 6 months or a year I'll be still around cheering them on.

Edited July 21, 2015 by Buckaroo

[Boildown]

This is the gaming equivalent of the "we choose to go to the moon" speech by JFK.

I thought this comment was so apt, it inspired me to make something:

 

 

Original photo: http://x-tech.am/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/original.jpg

[Nazraith]

Who is this Derek Smart guy? Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[CyberianK]

Who is this Derek Smart guy? Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

A Nobody very good at creating attention even when everyone keeps saying don't give him attention but does so by stating that. Just like me bumping this thread when I reply to you. Now I feel guilty and want to shoot myself. :-)

Edited July 23, 2015 by CyberianK

[Nazraith]

Well, don't do that! Wait! Now I've bumped this thread. Public Safety Notice: Please do not respond to this thread as it may induce mental anguish. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[GeraldEvans]

This is a letter from the chairman thread. Take your Bull-ship 3000ad and Line of Denial talk to the honorary degree thread and feel free to not bump it :p

[Nazraith]

He seems like an idiot to me. Just based on past game productions it's a no brainer to put my trust in Chris Roberts over the other guy. CR says he will be successful, then he will be. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Hammer173]

Who is this Derek Smart guy? Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

Chris is reaching the game development  boundaries of insanity and we are in it with him. His vision is something that never has been done before but we believe in the vision becoming reality. I give Derek Smart his proper french title "Gros Malin" - "Smart Ass", enough said.

We know Chris can do it because we played the games he made Star Citizen will be those games raised to the 100th power and with backers like us he will get there. Chris has balls of brass, being the first to challenge what some say can't be done. When we launch all these negative people will be nothing more than a fart in the wind.

[Scotterius]

Derek Smart isn't an idiot.  He was just never good at people, and is manic.  His games were unplayable by most people.  He tried, but he never had me as a supporter.  I bought every Chris Robert's game I could (well never got strike commander).

Perhaps he sees Chris Roberts as a threat to his own self worth.  In short he is kind of under the weather.

 

[GeraldEvans]

Strike Commander was wonderful! Time to go back and play it. :)