Jump to content
VoA

10 for the Designers: Episode 02

Recommended Posts

 

Published on Apr 13, 2015

Calix Reneau and Matthew Sherman answer 10 questions submitted by the subscribers. If you'd like to become a subscriber stop visit www.robertsspaceindustries.com!

00:46 - Repair System

03:17 - Physically Challenged Play

05:36 - Multi-Crew Stations

07:20 - Crafting System

09:03 - Environmental Impact on Flying

10:59 - Vanguard Redundant Systems

12:52 - Target Vectors

14:27 - USE Icon

16:22 - Persistence Duration

17:51 - Formation Flight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

- What kind of experience does the design team have in maintenance that they are able to design the repair system? How important is the repair system when designing a ship? How in-depth will ship engineer gameplay be?
  • 1) None. But thatnks to the entire team at CIG we have a lot of people we can refernce.
  • The gameplay loops they're looking at will have a lot of discreet actions so an overall problem can be quite complex.
  • Inspired by CarMechanic 2014 and Trauma Center.
  • There's a cool prototype being worked on.

 

- How are people who are mentally or physically challenged going to be able to progress through skill-based progression?
  • Part of our solution here is the wide variety of support for input devices.
  • One of the core elements is the specialization roles: You can go really deep, but you don't have to.
  • You don't even have to fly a ship. You can find something that you enjoy.

 

- Will a pilot be able to shut down and restart individual engines in-flight? Perhaps shutting down two of the four engines on a Constellation in cruise to conserve fuel.
  • Yes. The whole point of multi-crew is that you can split up the systems, but that means not everybody needs access to them all.
  • Radar, shields, etc will have a lot of granularity that you can focus on when you're not in combat or otherwise having your attention maxxed elsewhere.

 

- In SWG we could experiment on items to become better crafters. Is there something similar planned for Star Citizen so that an individual can make a name for themselves?
  • Yes. CR wants this.
  • Instead of a weapons-smith skill it will be more about how many things you break until you determine just how to max things out.
  • It will be equal parts art and science.

 

- Has there been any thought given to observing aerodynamics for instance in a Nebula or denser clouds of gas to nerf strafe fighting?
  • Does the environment affect flight? Not yet, but it is intended to.
  • Not to the extent of atmospheric flight, but there will be ion-storms that may affect your shields or volitile nebulas that prevent you from using your thrusters too much.
  • TL;DR: No

 

- Are we able to use the redundant systems of the Vanguard on the fly, using low-emission systems for cruise and switching to higher powered ones for combat? Or installing both splash and direct damage shields so you can change configurations mid-mission?
  • Absolutely. The exact mechanics are not set up yet, but you could set your direct damage shield to the front and your splash damage shield to the aft and then do an attack run on a capital ship with balistic defense to the fore and missile defense to the rear.
  • The redundancy will be able to function in whatever direction you want.

 

- If a pilot spots another ship, will they be able to project the target's position and vector to other players or will they have to describe the target's vector.
  • I'd love to hear you describe the ship's vector. Seriously. I don't know how you'd do that.
  • This is an intersection of the targeting system and your comm system, and the basis of the Hornet Tracker.
  • You will be able to send target information to another player who doesn't have it.
  • A Tracker might send it to a Herald and the Herald can send it much further.

 

- Is there a plan to get rid of the USE icon?
  • Yes. But beyond that it needs to tell you what you're doing, whether opening a cockpit or a jar.
  • USE is pretty deeply set in the game engine so it will take a lot of effort to replace it.
  • We have it working in a vacuum but we're not sure what it will look like when it's working all together.
     

- If I find a derelict or something that that has high value but is beyond my ability to retrieve, how long will it persist in it's location so I can notify other players and have it be there when they show up?
  • We're getting the exact details sorted out.
  • If you find a big prize you should be able to send a mesage and have friends show up with a bigger ship if you're still there.
  • A lot is still in the works. It is a priority though.

 

- Will there be a system put in place to assist with formation flying and even jumping so that you could be locked into escort formation when flying with a capital ship?
  • Recent conversation with John Pritchet about picking a flight leader and having your IFCS (via friendly IFCS handshake) to do complicated maneuvers based around the leader's position instead of around your position in space.
  • This should be difficult but it's something we're hoping to try soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clever pick with the question 6 about the Vanguard. I'm glad they cleared that up since there's still a lot of unknown features of that ship. Wish every concept sale would have a "10 to the devs about the ship" during the last day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By VoA
      https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/4/thread/3-7-trade-economy-is-a-massive-step-back/2436975
      jmuehle.cig@jmuehle_cig Yesterday at 10:50 pm
      Hi Jack,

      Thanks for the effort you've put into this, and the passion you have for trading gameplay! I'm glad to hear that you loved the changes with 3.6.

      As you pointed out, the prices in this 3.7 aren't just close to 3.5 prices, they're exactly 3.5 prices. Due to an oversight, old values for trade routes were added over the values set in 3.6 when we added new inventory for the hand-minable items. We've already taken measures to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again in the future.

      Citizens, rejoice! 3.6 prices will be restored as soon as possible. Your diligence is very much appreciated, and your commitment is exactly what makes Star Citizen great!
    • By Pharesm
      Those in Concierge may have noticed Third's topic on the $0 CCU removal having backfired completely, by formulating the database operation incorrectly.
      Some $0 CCUs that originally cost money before pricing changes were removed
      A lot of $0 CCUs that were free, now have a value due to price changes and have been left on accounts.
       
       
    • By John Daemons
      Hi! I am John Daemons, founder of 92.9 Orbital FM.
      https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNyHnlTAUl2n-WI1_KBltMw1G3BGyEra4
      Check it out and if you like the project and would like to participate, let’s get in touch! 
      o7 see ya ‘round the verse !
    • By Nord
      I'm curious, what is the average salary for a developer at CIG?
      Doing a quick google search the lowest is around $44k a year to $120k a year for a game developer. This is in the US. CIG has multiple studios around the world which also differentiate the average income. Let's say the average across all studios is $60k a year (a "wild" guess) and they now have around 500 employees. That's $30 million each year.
      Do we know how much CIG has used on salaries since 2012? I don't know the math here since I don't know all the numbers, but my wild guess would be around $80-90 million since 2012. If you add properties and other costs I'm thinking we are around $130 million in total. Giving them a $70 million + buffer, which is a 2 year salary guarantee for those 500 employees.  
       
      If this is even close, I feel comfort in knowing the funding is still going strong and they have at least 2 years to finish it up if money stops flowing. 
       
×
×
  • Create New...